Periodontal health, cognitive decline, and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
Preliminary results for the effect of periodontal health on cognitive decline were presented (poster presentation) at Alzheimer's Association International Conference (AAIC) 2020 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Funding information: Ella ja Georg Ehrnroothin Säätiö; Juho Vainion Säätiö; Minerva Foundation; Päivikki ja Sakari Sohlbergin Säätiö; Suomen Aivosäätiö; Suomen Kulttuurirahasto; European Research Council, Grant/Award Number: 804371
Abstract
Background
Emerging evidence indicates that poor periodontal health adversely impacts cognition. This review examined the available longitudinal evidence concerning the effect of poor periodontal health on cognitive decline and dementia.
Methods
Comprehensive literature search was conducted on five electronic databases for relevant studies published until April 2022. Longitudinal studies having periodontal health as exposure and cognitive decline and/or dementia as outcomes were considered. Random effects pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals were generated (pooled odds ratio for cognitive decline and hazards ratio for dementia) to assess whether poor periodontal health increases the risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Heterogeneity between studies was estimated by I2 and the quality of available evidence was assessed through quality assessment criteria.
Results
Adopted search strategy produced 2132 studies for cognitive decline and 2023 for dementia, from which 47 studies (24 for cognitive decline and 23 for dementia) were included in this review. Poor periodontal health (reflected by having periodontitis, tooth loss, deep periodontal pockets, or alveolar bone loss) was associated with both cognitive decline (OR = 1.23; 1.05–1.44) and dementia (HR = 1.21; 1.07–1.38).
Further analysis, based on measures of periodontal assessment, found tooth loss to independently increase the risk of both cognitive decline (OR = 1.23; 1.09–1.39) and dementia (HR = 1.13; 1.04–1.23). Stratified analysis based on the extent of tooth loss indicated partial tooth loss to be important for cognitive decline (OR = 1.50; 1.02–2.23) and complete tooth loss for dementia (HR = 1.23; 1.05–1.45). However, the overall quality of evidence was low, and associations were at least partly due to reverse causality.
Conclusions
Poor periodontal health and tooth loss appear to increase the risk of both cognitive decline and dementia. However, the available evidence is limited (e.g., highly heterogenous, lacking robust methodology) to draw firm conclusions. Further well-designed studies involving standardized periodontal and cognitive health assessment and addressing reverse causality are highly warranted.
Key points
- Poor periodontal health might contribute to the risk of both cognitive decline and dementia, although existing evidence has low quality and does not fully exclude reverse causality
- Tooth loss appears to be independently associated with poorer cognition
- This association might be mediated by different characteristics of periodontal health, for example, extent of tooth loss
Why does this paper matter?
This is a comprehensive systematic review with qualitative assessment and meta-analysis, investigating the effect of different measures of periodontal health, and highlighting the preventive potential of periodontal health for cognitive decline and dementia.
INTRODUCTION
Dementia is a syndrome characterized by progressive cognitive decline and functional incapacitation. Over 50 million people are affected by dementia worldwide and owing to an increase in aging population, the prevalence of dementia is expected to triple by 2050.1 Less severe cognitive deterioration such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI) denotes a pathological cognitive decline in which functional independence is largely retained. MCI is a heterogeneous and still developing concept. Its prevalence varies significantly between different population groups ranging from 5% to 41%.2 Same pathological processes underlie milder forms of cognitive deterioration (e.g., MCI) and dementia, partly explaining high conversion rate of MCI into dementia.3 Moreover, both dementia and MCI are classified within the same cluster of neurocognitive disorders in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5); MCI or other milder forms of pathological cognitive decline as mild neurocognitive disorders, and dementias represent major neurocognitive disorder.4
Dementias and even milder forms of pathological cognitive decline are debilitating conditions that significantly compromise the quality of life and impose an enormous socioeconomic burden on caregivers and healthcare systems.1, 2 Much research has been focused on identifying modifiable risk factors, for example, cardiovascular diseases, smoking, and unhealthy diet,5 and targeting them through various interventions (e.g., pharmacotherapy and/or lifestyle modification).5-7 Among the many risk factors for dementia and cognitive decline, oral health measures (e.g., periodontitis, tooth loss) have only started to be recently explored.8-17
Periodontitis is the inflammation of tooth-supporting tissues which in severe cases leads to tooth loss. It affects about 10%–15% of the world's adult population.18 Periodontal health is an important health determinant linked to various systemic conditions (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular diseases).19 The available evidence on periodontal health and cognitive deterioration is insufficient and subject to limitations.8-17, 20-30 Most individual studies lack comprehensive exposure and outcome assessments and have a shorter duration. Also, in the past two years, several studies have been published8-17 which warrant synthesis and evaluation. Previous literature reviews restricted their analysis by either exposure, outcome, or both, that is, they explored either periodontitis or tooth loss in relation to either cognitive impairment or dementia (but not all simultaneously). Moreover, meta-analyses had methodological limitations, for example, combined different effect estimates (odds ratio [OR], hazards ratio [HR], risk ratio [RR]) or effect estimates from different study designs,20-30 and did not consider reverse causality (poor periodontal health due to cognitive decline/dementia). Therefore, this work aims to address these limitations, synthesize, and evaluate all updated evidence on this evolving topic.
METHODS
Definition of periodontal health
In this review, poor periodontal health was defined as having periodontitis or any of the clinical parameters by which periodontal deterioration is identified, including deeper periodontal pockets (PPDs), clinical attachment loss (CAL), or alveolar bone loss (ABL). Untreated/severe periodontal disease leads to tooth loss,18, 31 and is one of the leading causes of tooth loss among older adults.32, 33 Moreover, tooth loss is one of the most widely used surrogate measures of periodontal status in research. Therefore, low tooth count/tooth loss was also considered as an indicator of poor periodontal health in this review. However, since tooth loss can result from causes other than periodontal deterioration, tooth loss was also independently assessed for its impact on cognitive outcomes.
Definition of cognitive decline
Although there are several definitions and diagnostic criteria for MCI,34, 35 it is still a concept under development, and may not always be easily distinguishable from age-related cognitive decline. Due to the variety of definitions used in the literature, this review focused on the more general term “cognitive decline,” to capture all relevant studies and ensure coverage of the full spectrum of pathological cognitive deterioration not severe enough to compromise functional independence (i.e., not meeting criteria for dementia).
Search strategy
Systematic search for English language studies, published until April 30, 2022, was conducted on five electronic databases, Medline via PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO. Search was applied separately for cognitive decline and dementia. For cognitive decline, “periodontitis,” “tooth loss,” “cognitive impairment,” “cognitive deterioration,” “cognitive decline,” “prospective,” “cohort,” “retrospective,” “follow-up,” and “longitudinal” were used as keywords. For dementia, additional keywords such as “dementia,” “Alzheimer's disease,” and “vascular dementia” were used. Search strategy was applied according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis—PRISMA (Figure 1).

Inclusion criteria
Population (P)
Longitudinal studies were conducted on participants without dementia at baseline.
Exposure (E)
Studies with periodontal health assessment as exposure. All studies were considered regardless of the measure used to assess periodontal health. This also included studies with tooth loss as exposure.
Outcome (O)
Studies with cognitive decline and/or dementia diagnosis.
Case reports, reviews, cross-sectional, and animal studies were excluded.
Quality assessment
Each study was assessed for risk of bias in 4 major and 1 minor domain. Quality assessment criteria were derived from previously published studies,36, 37 and are described in Supplementary Text S1.
Study selection and data extraction
Search strategy returned 2132 studies for cognitive decline and 2023 for dementia. After screening abstracts and removing duplicates, 77 studies for cognitive decline and 75 for dementia were obtained for full-text appraisal. Two authors (S.A. and R.S.) independently reviewed full texts and hand-searched references of included studies to identify any additional study meeting inclusion criteria. In cases of disagreements, a third author (A.S.) was consulted, and a consensus was reached. Relevant data including study duration, exposure-outcome assessment measures, and effect estimates were extracted.
Meta-analysis
Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 statistical program (Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager).38 Individual studies used different effect estimates, which were considered statistically incomparable. Therefore, the most widely used effect estimate for each outcome, that is, OR for cognitive decline and HR for dementia were used to compute random effects pooled estimates with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI, p = 0.05) and degree of heterogeneity (I2).
Multiple meta-analysis models (summarized in Table 1) were computed based on measures of periodontal health assessment to evaluate different aspects of periodontal-cognitive health association. For each study, only a single effect estimate was entered into each model. Therefore, for studies using multiple measures to assess periodontal health, only effect estimates corresponding to more accurate measures were selected (Supplementary Text S1). For example, periodontitis-specific measures (which includes periodontitis diagnosis, PPDs, ABL, and CAL) were used instead of tooth loss in primary models (Figures 2A and 3A).
Periodontal health assessment | Cognitive decline | Dementia |
---|---|---|
Poor periodontal health (Diagnosis of Periodontitis, PPDs, ABL, and tooth loss) | Figures 2A, S1A, S3A | Figures 3A, S2A, S4A |
Periodontitis-specific measures (Periodontitisa, PPDs, and ABL) | Figures 2B, S1B, S3B | Figures 3B, S2B, S4B |
Tooth loss (low vs. high tooth count) | Figures 2C, S1C, S3C | Figures 3C, S2C, S4C |
Complete tooth loss (0 teeth remaining vs. at least 1 tooth remaining) | Figures 2D, S1D, S3D | Figures 3D, S2D, S4D |
Partial tooth loss (low vs. high tooth count, excluding 0 teeth remaining) | Figures 2E, S1E, S3E | Figures 3E, S2E, S4E |
- Abbreviations: ABL, alveolar bone loss; PPDs, periodontal pocket depths.
- a Diagnosis of Periodontitis: International Statistical Classification of Disease (ICD), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Academy of Periodontology (AAP), Community Periodontal Index (CPI), biofilm-gingival interface classification (BGI) criteria.


Similarly, for studies where a particular measure of periodontal health was stratified into multiple categories (periodontitis into mild, moderate, and severe, or tooth loss into multiple tooth count categories), pooled estimates for individual studies were first generated and then entered into meta-analysis (Figures 2A–E and 3A–E). However, corresponding supplementary models were also computed with individual estimates (Figure S1A–E for cognitive decline; Figure S2A–E for dementia). Concerning cognitive decline, studies presenting estimates for >1 cognitive test, estimates corresponding to more sensitive or comprehensive tests were used, for example, mini-mental state examination (MMSE) over spatial coping test (SCT).
Addressing reverse causality
As cognitive decline may also lead to poor periodontal health, reverse causality may confound the association.39, 40 To account for this, only longitudinal studies were included.41 For dementia as an outcome, studies were restricted to dementia-free participants at baseline, and an additional meta-analysis was conducted restricting each main model (Figure 3A–E) to studies with ≥10 years of follow-up (Figure S4A–E). This was not possible for cognitive decline as most studies had <10 years of follow-up. Therefore, an additional meta-analysis was conducted excluding studies with unclear dementia/cognitive status of participants at baseline (Figure S3A–E).
RESULTS
Forty seven studies were included in this review: 24 for cognitive decline8, 9, 15-17, 42-60 and 23 for dementia10-14, 47, 61-77 (Figure 1). Characteristics of included studies are summarized in Table S1.
Quality assessment
Quality assessment of included studies is summarized in Table S2 and Supplementary Text S2. For cognitive decline, the overall risk of bias was high; 1 study received “moderate”56 and 23 “low”8, 9, 15-17, 42-55, 57-60 for overall quality. For dementia, overall risk of bias was moderate; 2 studies receiving “good,”67, 70 9 “moderate”10, 13, 14, 64, 68, 71, 72, 74, 77 and 12 “low”11, 12, 47, 61-63, 65, 66, 69, 73, 75, 76 for overall quality. In general, studies with dementia as an outcome included younger participants, had a larger sample size and longer study duration, and had better exposure and outcome assessment.
Poor periodontal health and cognitive decline
All 24 studies were population-based longitudinal studies.8, 9, 15-17, 42-60 23 studies included both male and female participants,8, 9, 15-17, 42, 43, 45-60 and 1 only male participants.44 15 studies included participants aged ≥65 years at baseline,8, 15-17, 43, 45, 46, 49-52, 54, 55, 58, 60 while 9 studies also included younger participants.9, 42, 44, 47, 48, 53, 56, 57, 59 8 studies had a sample size of <1000 participants,15, 44, 46, 49, 50, 52, 55, 56 8 included 1000–5000 participants,42, 43, 45, 51, 53, 57-59 and 8 studies >5000 participants.8, 9, 16, 17, 47, 48, 54, 60 16 studies had a follow-up period ≤6 years,9, 15, 17, 42, 43, 45-47, 49-55, 58 7 between 7 and 13 years,8, 16, 48, 56, 57, 59, 60 and 1 of 32 years.44 9 of the 24 studies had >40% subject attrition.15, 17, 42, 45, 46, 48, 50, 53, 57 There was great variability in periodontal health assessment. Two studies used Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)/American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) criteria to diagnose periodontitis,49, 55 2 used Community Periodontal Index (CPI),51, 52 and 1 Biofilm-gingival interface classification (BGI).56 4 studies used PPDs,15, 43, 44, 50 2 ABL,42, 44 and 1 gingival bleeding47 to assess periodontal health. Tooth loss was used by 21 studies,8, 9, 16, 17, 42-48, 50-54, 56-60 with 11 using self-reported tooth count.8, 9, 16, 17, 47, 48, 54, 57-60
Cognitive status was assessed through at least 1 cognitive test in 22 studies,8, 9, 15, 16, 42-52, 54-60 while 2 studies used subjective assessment.17, 53 14 of the 22 studies used a single cognitive test15, 16, 42, 45-50, 54, 55, 57-59 with MMSE used by 15 studies.15, 16, 42-44, 46-49, 51, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58 Others included some form of recall test,51, 52, 59, 60 digit symbol substitution test,43, 56 TICS-m,8, 60 Montreal cognitive assessment,45, 50 word fluency,56 clock drawing test,43 and SCT.44 Most studies defined “cognitive decline” as the difference in scores between baseline and follow-up, without a validated well-defined threshold, without clearly using available MCI definitions, and without explicitly excluding participants with incident dementia. Studies with “cognitive impairment” as an outcome used, for example, MMSE at follow-up with a threshold of <24 or <25, but no formal MCI diagnosis.
Associations
Twenty studies reported a significant association between at least 1 measure of periodontal health and cognitive decline, that is, higher risk of cognitive decline in individuals having either low tooth count, a higher number of extracted teeth, having periodontitis, deeper periodontal pockets, or alveolar bone loss8, 9, 15-17, 42, 44-49, 51, 52, 54-58, 60 (Table S1).
Periodontitis-specific measures
Two of the 5 studies with periodontitis as exposure observed significant association.49, 55 Two of the 4 studies with PPDs15, 44 and both studies with ABL42, 44 reported a significant association.
Tooth loss
Eighteen of the 21 studies with tooth loss as exposure observed significant association for at least 1 category of low tooth count.8, 9, 16, 17, 42-48, 51, 52, 54, 56-58, 60
Poor periodontal health and dementia
All 23 studies were population-based longitudinal studies.10-14, 47, 61-77 21 studies were composed of male and female participants10-14, 47, 61, 62, 64-68, 70-77 and 2 had only female participants.63, 69 8 studies included participants aged ≥65 years at baseline,11, 13, 14, 62, 63, 65, 68, 73 while 15 studies also included younger participants.10, 12, 47, 61, 64, 66, 67, 69-72, 74-77 4 studies had a sample size of <1000 participants,62, 63, 65, 69 3 between 1000 and 5000,61, 66, 73 11 between 5000 and 100,000,10-13, 47, 64, 67, 68, 70, 74, 75 and five studies >100,000 participants.14, 71, 72, 76, 77
Study duration of 5 studies was ≤6 years,11, 12, 47, 61, 66 11 between 7 and 13 years,13, 14, 62-64, 68, 71, 72, 74, 76, 77 and 7 of ≥14 years.10, 61, 65, 67, 69, 70, 75 21 of the 23 studies had <20% subject attrition.10, 12-14, 47, 61-69, 71-77 There was great variability in periodontal health assessment. Six studies diagnosed periodontitis according to International Statistical Classification of Disease (ICD) criteria64, 68, 71, 74, 76, 77 and 1 by periodontal profile classes.70 3 studies used PPDs,12, 62, 65 1 ABL,63 and 1 CAL.62 15 studies used tooth loss,10, 11, 13, 14, 47, 61, 63, 65-67, 69, 72, 73, 75, 76 of which four studies assessed tooth loss through available data on tooth extraction13, 14, 72, 76 and 5 used self-reported tooth count.11, 47, 61, 73, 75 All 23 studies diagnosed dementia according to standardized criteria: 11 used ICD,10, 12-14, 62, 64, 68, 71, 72, 76, 77 8 used DSM,47, 61, 65, 66, 69, 70, 74, 75 and 1 used Korean Classification of Disease (KCD) criteria.67 3 studies used other criteria/methods of identifying dementia, consistent with standardized criteria.11, 63, 73
Associations
Eighteen studies reported a significant association between at least 1 measure of periodontal health and dementia (Table S1).
Periodontitis-specific measures
All seven studies with periodontitis as exposure observed significant association.64, 68, 71, 74, 76, 77 1 of the 3 studies with PPDs as exposure observed significant association.62
Tooth loss
Ten studies observed significant association between at least one category of low tooth count and dementia.10, 11, 13, 47, 66, 67, 69, 72, 73, 76 However, one study observed a significantly lower risk of dementia in individuals with low tooth count.65
Meta-analysis
Poor periodontal health and cognitive decline
For cognitive decline, pooled OR was generated (Figure 2A–E). Primary model (Figure 2A) included 10 studies and showed a significantly higher risk of cognitive decline in individuals with poor periodontal health, OR (95% CI) = 1.23 (1.05–1.44). Analysis based on measures of periodontal assessment found tooth loss to be independently associated with cognitive decline, OR (95% CI) = 1.23 (1.09–1.39) (Figure 2C). On stratification of tooth loss into complete (Figure 2D) and partial tooth loss (Figure 2E), only partial tooth loss (included only two studies) was associated with cognitive decline, OR (95% CI) = 1.50 (1.02–2.23). Apart from the model for partial tooth loss, all models carried high values of I2 (>50) reflecting significant heterogeneity between studies. Figure S1A–E, where individual categories of periodontal health were entered, corroborated with the main analysis.
Poor periodontal health and dementia
For dementia, pooled HR was generated (Figure 3A–E). Primary model included 13 studies and showed increased dementia risk linked to poor periodontal health, HR (95% CI) = 1.21 (1.07–1.38). When the analysis was stratified into periodontitis-specific measures (Figure 3B) and tooth loss (Figure 3C), tooth loss was independently associated with dementia, HR (95% CI) = 1.13 (1.04–1.23) (Figure 3C). On stratification of tooth loss into complete (Figure 3D) and partial tooth loss (Figure 3E), complete tooth loss was significantly associated with dementia, HR (95% CI) = 1.23 (1.05–1.45) (Figure 3D). Although models for periodontitis-specific measures (Figure 3C) and partial tooth loss (Figure 3E) did not achieve statistical significance, they were in line with other models, however, all models carried high values of I2 (>50). Figure S2A–E, where individual categories of periodontal health were entered, corroborated with the main analysis.
Accounting for reverse causality
For dementia, the additional meta-analysis largely corroborated with the main analysis, associating periodontal heath with dementia (Figure S4A–E). However, the association between tooth loss and dementia became statistically non-significant (Figure S4C,D). Contrarily, for cognitive decline, the association became stronger and was significant across all models (Figure S3A–E), even for periodontitis-specific measures and complete tooth loss which were not significant in the main analysis (Figure 2B,D). Interestingly, these associations were stronger compared to the association between poor periodontal health and dementia.
DISCUSSION
We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis and observed significant associations between poor periodontal health with risk of cognitive decline and dementia. Poor periodontal health, overall tooth loss, and complete tooth loss were associated with dementia; poor periodontal health, overall tooth loss, and partial tooth loss were associated with cognitive decline. However, overall quality of evidence was low. Most studies had a high risk of bias, particularly cognitive decline studies, which mainly involved participants aged ≥65 years, had a shorter follow-up, and involved heterogenous exposure (e.g., tooth count, PPDs, ABL) and outcome assessments (different cognitive tests).
Impact of reverse causality
Analysis of dementia studies with ≥10 years of follow-up showed an overall weakening of the effect of poor periodontal health on dementia as compared to the main analysis, with estimates for tooth loss becoming statistically non-significant. This indicates that part of the associations observed in the main analysis (which also included studies with a shorter follow-up) was due to reverse causality. Since neuropathological and cognitive changes leading to dementia develop over many years, a study duration <10 years is less likely to remove the potential effects of cognitive impairment on periodontal health.
Interestingly, in additional analyses excluding studies where dementia/cognitive status at baseline was unclear, poor periodontal health had stronger associations with cognitive decline across all models, that is, all measures of poor periodontal health, periodontitis-specific measures, overall tooth loss, complete tooth loss, and partial tooth loss. This unexpected finding may have two main explanations. It is possible that periodontal health is a risk factor for multiple types and severity levels of cognitive decline (not just dementia), and the broad definition of cognitive decline in available studies captured the full range of effects. However, the stronger associations may still partly reflect reverse causality, since participants with dementia at follow-up were not explicitly excluded from these studies, and the shorter follow-up (<10 years) predisposes them to reverse causality effects.
This pattern of stronger associations with shorter study duration has been previously described for other risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia, for example, depression (which can also be a prodromal dementia symptom).78 Our findings emphasize the crucial need for improving the design of periodontal-cognitive health studies, with particular focus on sufficient follow-up time and thorough data analytical consideration of cognitive impairment and dementia status at both baseline and follow-up visits.
Mechanisms underlying periodontal-cognitive associations
The findings of this review might indicate the involvement of multiple mechanisms in the association between periodontal and cognitive health. Periodontitis is suggested to facilitate the development of neuroinflammation via systemic inflammation, evident by increased systemic proinflammatory mediators.79 Systemic inflammation per se is an independent determinant of cognitive deterioration and links other risk factors including diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and even aging to cognitive deterioration.80, 81 Additionally, a more direct role of periodontal pathogens has been suggested, adding to the increasing body of evidence concerning possible infectious etiology of cognitive deterioration.82, 83
Tooth loss may also independently impair cognition by reducing sensorimotor stimulation from masticatory apparatus which has been linked to atrophic brain changes. This association might depend on factors like magnitude/dose and length of exposure.25, 84 An insight into this possible dose-dependent effect is provided by our finding of somewhat higher ORs/HRs for complete versus partial tooth loss. Furthermore, non-traumatic/non-surgical causes of tooth loss (e.g., dental caries and periodontitis) lead to gradual and progressive tooth loss over decades. If the extent of tooth loss indicates chronicity of the underlying process (e.g., periodontitis) then higher chronicity (as reflected by complete tooth loss) might be more likely to lead to cognitive deterioration. But current evidence concerning this is scant and lacks specific details (e.g., exact causes and time of tooth loss), however, it points to an important direction for future research.
The impact of periodontal health on cognition may also be more pronounced during a specific time window (e.g., midlife), as reported for other dementia risk factors.85 This may explain the protective effect of low tooth count against dementia observed in individuals with lower education.65 Low education is known to increase the risk of early tooth loss,86 thus may decrease the periodontal inflammatory burden and its subsequent impact on cognition at midlife.87 Furthermore, nutritional imbalances (e.g., antioxidants, vitamin B and E, etc.) and reduction in cerebral blood flow might also link tooth loss with cognitive deterioration.88 The periodontal-cognitive health association may additionally be mediated by common risk factors such as systemic comorbidities, depression, lower education, and socioeconomic status.5, 89
Strengths and limitations
While previous reviews mostly focused on either periodontitis or tooth loss alone, or on cognitive decline or dementia alone, this review covered the whole spectrum of periodontal deterioration including tooth loss. Although tooth loss may occur due to causes other than periodontitis, periodontal disease is one of the most common causes of tooth loss at older ages, when dementia is also most likely to occur. Furthermore, cognitive decline and dementia are part of a continuum, from normal aging to first asymptomatic, then prodromal, and later fully manifest disease. In this review, we examined both these outcomes and synthesized evidence across the cognitive functioning continuum.
To our knowledge, this systematic review included so far the largest number of longitudinal studies (N = 47), facilitating a better powered and more robust meta-analysis evaluating and strengthening the existing evidence. Previous meta-analyses did not account for multiple effect estimates originating from a single cohort and combined different effect estimate types, which may have affected the pooled estimates. We have addressed this by incorporating one estimate from each cohort and generating pooled estimates from comparable effect estimate types. We also accounted for reverse causality in our analysis.
The limitations of this work include consideration of English language publications only. Quality assessment criteria might also have limitations on internal validity. Moreover, it was not possible to account for periodontal treatment, severity, and length of exposure. In the case of tooth loss, the exact cause was not known. Due to substantial variability in cognitive tests and definitions of cognitive decline in included studies, it was not possible to reliably separate pathological impairment/MCI from other types of cognitive decline (e.g., age-related) that may not necessarily progress to dementia. Also, available cognitive decline studies did not clearly specify if incident dementia had been excluded from their analyses.
CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Poor periodontal health may increase the risk of both cognitive decline and dementia. The overall quality of evidence was low, and several areas of periodontal-cognitive health interplay remain to be investigated. From a clinical perspective, our findings emphasize the importance of monitoring and management of periodontal health in the context of dementia prevention, although the available evidence is not yet sufficient to point out clear ways for early identification of at-risk individuals, and the most efficient measures to prevent cognitive deterioration. However, given the impact of cognitive deterioration on periodontal health, oral health professionals are well-placed to track and intervene in early changes in periodontal health and oral self-care, but only if dental healthcare services are sustained over time and adequate oral health support is provided in the home setting when deterioration in self-care is identified. Importantly, our results clearly indicate several key recommendations for future studies on periodontal and cognitive health to improve the state of current evidence and address these gaps (Figure 4).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Conceptualization: Sam Asher, Ruth Stephen, Anna Liisa Suominen, Päivi Mäntylä, and Alina Solomon. Methodology: Sam Asher, Ruth Stephen, Anna Liisa Suominen, and Alina Solomon. Data analysis: Sam Asher and Alina Solomon. Supervision: Anna Liisa Suominen, Päivi Mäntylä, and Alina Solomon. Manuscript writing: Sam Asher, Ruth Stephen, and Alina Solomon. Reviewing: Sam Asher, Ruth Stephen, Anna Liisa Suominen, Päivi Mäntylä, and Alina Solomon.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
SPONSOR'S ROLE
The funding sources had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.