Volume 55, Issue 10 p. 1663-1669

Collaborative Clinical Quality Improvement for Pressure Ulcers in Nursing Homes

(See editorial comments by Dr. George Taler on pp 1674–1675)

Joanne Lynn MD

Joanne Lynn MD

RAND, Arlington, Virginia

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Jeff West RN, MPH

Jeff West RN, MPH

Qualis Health, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Hausmann MS

Susan Hausmann MS

Qualis Health, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
David Gifford MD, MPH

David Gifford MD, MPH

Quality Partners of Rhode Island, Providence, Rhode Island

Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, Rhode Island

Search for more papers by this author
Rachel Nelson MHA

Rachel Nelson MHA

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Paul McGann SM, MD

Paul McGann SM, MD

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Nancy Bergstrom RN, PhD

Nancy Bergstrom RN, PhD

University of Texas Health Sciences Center—Houston, Houston, Texas; and

Search for more papers by this author
Judith A. Ryan RN, PhD

Judith A. Ryan RN, PhD

The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 August 2007
Citations: 49
Address correspondence to Joanne Lynn, MD, 2318 Ashboro Drive, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]

Abstract

The National Nursing Home Improvement Collaborative aimed to reduce pressure ulcer (PU) incidence and prevalence. Guided by subject matter and process experts, 29 quality improvement organizations and six multistate long-term care corporations recruited 52 nursing homes in 39 states to implement recommended practices using quality improvement methods. Facilities monitored monthly PU incidence and prevalence, healing, and adoption of key care processes.

In residents at 35 regularly reporting facilities, the total number of new nosocomial Stage III to IV PUs declined 69%. The facility median incidence of Stage III to IV lesions declined from 0.3 per 100 occupied beds per month to 0.0 (P<.001) and the incidence of Stage II to IV lesions declined from 3.2 to 2.3 per 100 occupied beds per month (P=.03). Prevalence of Stage III to IV lesions trended down (from 1.3 to 1.1 residents affected per 100 occupied beds (P=.12). The incidence and prevalence of Stage II lesions and the healing time of Stage II to IV lesions remained unchanged. Improvement teams reported that Stage II lesions usually healed quickly and that new PUs corresponded with hospital transfer, admission, scars, obesity, and immobility and with noncompliant, younger, or newly declining residents. The publicly reported quality measure, prevalence of Stage I to IV lesions, did not improve. Participants documented disseminating methods and tools to more than 5,359 contacts in other facilities.

Results suggest that facilities can reduce incidence of Stage III to IV lesions, that the incidence of Stage II lesions may not correlate with the incidence of Stage III to IV lesions, and that the publicly reported quality measure is insensitive to substantial improvement. The project demonstrated multiple opportunities in collaborative quality improvement, including improving the measurement of quality and identifying research priorities, as well as improving care.