Monitoring Falls in Cohort Studies of Community-Dwelling Older People: Effect of the Recall Interval
DAG and LZR are supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs. DAG is also supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program and LZR by the Archstone Foundation.
Objectives: To determine whether the interval over which patients are asked to remember their falls affects fall reporting.
Design: Systematic literature review.
Participants: Individuals being monitored for falls in prospective studies that asked participants to recall falls over varying intervals.
Measurements: Sensitivity and specificity of retrospective recall compared with a criterion-standard prospective assessment using some form of ongoing fall monitoring.
Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Recall of falls in the previous year was specific (specificity 91–95%) but less sensitive (sensitivity 80–89%) than the criterion standard of ongoing prospective collection of fall data using fall calendars or postcards. Patients with injurious falls were more likely to recall their falls. Lower Mini-Mental State Examination score was associated with poorer recall of falls in the one study addressing this issue.
Conclusion: Whenever accurate data on all falls are critical, such as with interventions to decrease the rate of falls, researchers should gather information on falls every week or every month from study participants. The optimal method of fall monitoring—postcard, calendar, diary, telephone, or some combination of these—remains unknown.
The epidemiology of falls and syncope.
Clin Geriatr Med
2002; 18: 141–158.
et al. Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
2004; 328: 680.
Epidemiology of falls.
(Suppl 4): 3–7.
et al. Incidence, risk factors and consequences of falls among elderly subjects living in the community: A criteria-based analysis.
Eur J Public Health
1997; 7: 328–334.
Methodologic issues in the study of frequent and recurrent health problems.
Falls in the elderly. Ann Epidemiol
1990; 1: 49–56.
Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community.
N Engl J Med
1988; 319: 1701–1707.
et al. Adjusting for recall bias with the proportional hazards model.
Methods Inf Med
1991; 30: 108–110.
et al. [An examination of two reporting methods of falls among the elderly living in the community].
Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi
1996; 43: 983–988.
Accuracy of patient recall and chart documentation of falls.
J Am Board Fam Pract
1993; 6: 239–242.
Forgetting falls: The limited accuracy of recall of falls in the elderly.
J Am Geriatr Soc
1988; 36: 613–616.
Validating recall of falls by older people.
Accid Anal Prev
2000; 32: 371–372.
et al. [A comparison between three methods to investigate falls among the elderly living in the community].
Nippon Koshu Eisei Zasshi
2000; 47: 430–439.
et al. Attempts to prevent falls and injury: A prospective community study.
1992; 32: 450–456.