Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut;

Yale–New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes
Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut;

Qualidigm,
Middletown, Connecticut; and

Search for more papers by this author

Saif S. Rathore MPH,

Saif S. Rathore MPH

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and

Search for more papers by this author

Yongfei Wang MS,

Yongfei Wang MS

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and

Search for more papers by this author

Martha J. Radford MD,

Martha J. Radford MD

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and

Yale–New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes
Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut;

Qualidigm,
Middletown, Connecticut; and

Search for more papers by this author

Diana L. Ordin MD, MPH,

Diana L. Ordin MD, MPH

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Boston, Massachusetts.

Search for more papers by this author

Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM,

Harlan M. Krumholz MD, SM

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, and

Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut;

Yale–New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes
Research and Evaluation, New Haven, Connecticut;

Qualidigm,
Middletown, Connecticut; and

Search for more papers by this author

First published: 26 March 2003

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51154.x

Citations: 13

Address correspondence to Harlan M. Krumholz, MD, SM, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, Room IE-61 SHM, New Haven, CT 06520. E-mail: [email protected].

Share a link

Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
Wechat

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the proportion of older patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) incorporated in a commonly used set of AMI quality indicators.

Design: Retrospective analysis of a medical record database.

Setting: Nongovernmental U.S. acute care hospitals.

Participants: Medicare patients hospitalized for AMI between January 1994 and February 1996.

Measurements: Proportion of patients aged 65 and older classified as ideal candidates (without absolute or relative contraindications) for six Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services AMI quality indicators: aspirin (admission, discharge), beta-blocker (admission, discharge), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors at discharge, and time to reperfusion therapy.

Results: Of the 149,996 patients eligible for admission therapies, 10.1% were ideal candidates for reperfusion therapy, 65.0% for aspirin, and 34.7% for beta-blockers. Of the 116,919 patients eligible for discharge therapies, 47.7% were ideal candidates for aspirin, 17.6% for beta-blockers, and 15.2% for ACE inhibitors. More than one-quarter (26.8%) of all patients were ineligible for any of the six quality indicators; this proportion increased with age, ranging from 23.7% of patients aged 65 to 69 to 30.2% of patients aged 85 and older.

Conclusion: A substantial proportion of older patients were not included in AMI process quality measurement, with the proportion excluded higher in successively older age groups. The data highlight the need for additional research to determine effective treatment strategies for patients for whom the evidence base for clinical decision-making remains weak.

REFERENCES

1 Ryan TJ, Anderson JK, Antman EM et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28: 1328–1428.
10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00392-0
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
2 Jencks SF, Cuerdon T, Burwen DR et al. Quality of medical care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries: A profile at national and state levels. JAMA 2000; 284: 1670–1676.
10.1001/jama.284.13.1670
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
3 Marciniak TA, Ellerbeck EF, Radford MJ et al. Improving the quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1998; 279: 1351–1357.
10.1001/jama.279.17.1351
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
4 Jencks SF, Wilensky GR. The health care quality improvement initiative: A new approach to quality assurance in Medicare. JAMA 1992; 268: 900–903.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
5 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Quality Improvement Organizations (QIOs): Acute Myocardial Infarction Project Description [On-line]. Available at http://www.cms.hhs.gov/qio/1a1-a1.asp Accessed December 12, 2002.
Google Scholar
6 Ellerbeck EF, Jencks SF, Radford MJ et al. Quality of care for Medicare patients with acute myocardial infarction: A four state pilot study from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. JAMA 1995; 273: 1509–1514.
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
7 Krumholz HM, Friesinger GC, Cook EF et al. Relationship of age with eligibility for thrombolytic therapy and mortality among patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction. J Am Geriatr Soc 1994; 42: 127–131.
10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb04938.x
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
8 Horwitz RI, Viscoli CM, Clemens JD et al. Developing improved observational methods for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness. Am J Med 1990; 89: 630–638.
10.1016/0002-9343(90)90182-D
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
9 Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammill BG et al. Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 2001; 286: 708–713.
10.1001/jama.286.6.708
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
10 Rich MW. Treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2001; 10: 328–336.
10.1111/j.1076-7460.2001.00642.x
CASPubMedGoogle Scholar
11 Chen J, Radford MJ, Wang Y et al. Effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1950–1956.
10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01225-6
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
12 Rathore SS, Weinfurt KP, Gersh BJ et al. Reperfusion therapy among paced patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001; 142: 516–519.
10.1067/mhj.2001.117602
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
13 American Heart Association. Get with the guidelines. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association, 2002.
Web of Science®Google Scholar
14 American College of Cardiology. Guidelines Applied in Practice. Bethesda, MD: American College of Cardiology, 2002.
Web of Science®Google Scholar
15 Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. ORYX/Performance Measurement. Oakbrook Terrace, IL: Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, 2002.
Google Scholar
16 Petersen LA, Norman SL, Daley J et al. Outcome of acute myocardial infarction in Veterans Health Administration as compared with Medicare patients. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1934–1941.
10.1056/NEJM200012283432606
CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume51, Issue4

April 2003

Pages 466-475

Quality of Care of Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Who Is Included in Quality Improvement Measurement?

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Quality of Care of Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Who Is Included in Quality Improvement Measurement?

Abstract

REFERENCES

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information